Multiproto: Difference between revisions
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
No clear migration plan has yet been agreed. |
No clear migration plan has yet been agreed. |
||
The mantis tree (http://jusst.de/hg/mantis) which also uses the multiproto API has not yet been merged into multiproto, meaning that there is unnecessary duplication of the core code and any code fixes in either |
|||
tree are not automatically applied to both trees. |
|||
It has been reported http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-July/027464.html |
It has been reported http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-July/027464.html |
Revision as of 15:05, 30 July 2008
Multiproto is a proposal for version 3.3 of the linux DVB API which includes extensions for cards which support multiple DVB protocols (DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-T, DVB-C, DVB-H, ATSC, DSS).
It is an experimental project and is not currently implemented in any released version of Linux. No firm plan has been made for its inclusion in Linux.
Overview/Features
Discuss the features and facets of the project here ... this means you
Design Decisions
explain the choices made ... this means you
Technical Details
give a technical description of how the API change has been implemented ... this means you
New structs and enums have been added to expand the API for multiple frontends and the parameters required for protocols DVB-S, DSS, DVB-S2, DVB-T, DVB-H and ATSC. These are prefixed (at least for now) with "dvbfe_" and "DVBFE_" as opposed to the old "fe_" and "FE_". For details compare the old and new versions of include/linux/dvb/frontend.h. Currently multiproto implements both the new and old APIs and a glue layer to manage old/new drivers with new/old API calls. Presumably the plan is eventually to move to a pure 3.3 API and update all the drivers.
Simple enough you might think, but progress has been very slow. Since the first version, way back in April 2006, ten (10!) versions of the entire Linux kernel have been released. See http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2006-April/009522.html and http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux26Changes.
Evaluation and Alternatives
explain whether the design goals have been met or not ... this means you
1. There is repetition in the multiproto API arising from the use of unions of structs to hold parameters (often the same ones) for each type of frontend. However API calls (eg. ioctl dvbfe_params) are addressed to an individual frontend /dev/dvb/adapterN/frontendN so this repetition could be removed to create a cleaner API. For example these variables:
dvbfe_params.delsys.dvbs.fec dvbfe_params.delsys.dss.fec dvbfe_params.delsys.dvbs2.fec dvbfe_params.delsys.dvbc.fec
could be replaced by the simpler:
dvbfe_params.fec
Similarly for a number of other variables.
2. There is a problem with the design of the multiproto API. The routine DVBFE_GET_INFO actually changes the kernel state (in particular the variable which holds the delivery system). Simply calling DVBFE_SET_PARAMS with a complete correct set of parameters does not work. The corresponding screwy userspace code can be seen in the patched http://abraham.manu.googlepages.com/szap.c where DVBFE_GET_INFO is used to SET the delivery system variable before DVBFE_SET_PARAMS is called. Such odd unexpected behaviour is confusing and should not be accepted in the Linux kernel. At the very least some work needs to be done to rename the routines sensibly. DVBFE_GET_INFO appears to have been originally intended to provide information about the capabilities of the frontend, which is currently not apparent in its name. See http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-March/024266.html and http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-March/024281.html.
Alternatives: An alternative API has been created for the Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-4000 which makes minimal changes to the current v4l-dvb API in order to provide multifrontend support for DVB-T,DVB-S and DVB-S2 for that device. It offers backwards compatibility with existing binary multimedia applications for DVB-T and DVB-S without recompilation. Patches providing DVB-S2 support for szap and mythtv have been posted. See http://dev.kewl.org/hauppauge/experimental/, http://dev.kewl.org/hauppauge and http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-March/024243.html.
Status and Migration Plan
explain how a migration from the current API to multiproto could be achieved ... this means you
No clear migration plan has yet been agreed.
The mantis tree (http://jusst.de/hg/mantis) which also uses the multiproto API has not yet been merged into multiproto, meaning that there is unnecessary duplication of the core code and any code fixes in either tree are not automatically applied to both trees.
It has been reported http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-July/027464.html that the currently available Multiproto needs to be updated to compile cleanly with the latest kernel version 2.6.26. Volunteer? Last known good version = 2.6.24?
Making it Work
How to get it:
hg clone http://jusst.de/hg/multiproto
or
http://jusst.de/hg/multiproto/archive/tip.tar.bz2
Drivers
There are currently no in-kernel multiproto drivers. There are several cards which have experimental support in the multiproto tree, perhaps with additional patches.
Provide details of which drivers work with multiproto ... this means you
See the descriptions for the following cards:
Azurewave AD-SP400 CI (Twinhan VP-1041)
KNC1 DVB-S2 TV Station (PCI32, supports CI)
TerraTec Cinergy S2 PCI HD CI (PCI32, CI)
provide the details of where the drivers and patches and necessary tools are available ... this means you
provide details of how to compile for recent kernels -- this means you
Sample kernel output
provide the relevant portion of dmesg here
Tuner / DiSEqC / Player support
provide comprehensive details of how to upgrade multimedia applications to work with the new API ... this means you
Scanning and tuning applications generally will not work with the new API unless they are modified. The situation is arguably improving but the lack of patched applications (and guidance on patching) has hindered completion and testing of multiproto and new drivers, and adoption of the new API. Needless to say, patching drivers and multiple applications is a step too far for most potential testers.
dvb-apps : There is still no patched dvb-apps tree. Someone needs to create one ... why don't you?
scan : see patched version at http://jusst.de/manu/scan.tar.bz2
szap: see patched version at http://abraham.manu.googlepages.com/szap.c Also see information about szap2 at http://allrussian.info/thread.php?postid=187408#post187408 and http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-February/023836.html.
mplayer : someone needs to write a patch ... why don't you?
Kaffeine / xine-lib : someone needs to write a patch ... why don't you? There are some posts about getting Kaffeine to work with multiproto in these threads: http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-May/025882.html, http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-July/027141.html and in these two messages: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=48217036.3090709%40gmail.com&forum_name=kaffeine-devel and http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=481DE023.9000903%40gmail.com&forum_name=kaffeine-devel .
VDR : VDR version 1.5.14 and later require multiproto (v1.5.14 announcement: http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2008-January/015302.html
MythTV : Two patches (one DVB-S/S2, one DVB-S only) have been posted http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-January/022757.html. Current status?
dvbstream : Someone needs to write a patch ... why don't you? See http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-February/024056.html.
provide details of how to use with DiSEqC -- this means you
How to patch an application for Multiproto
provide guidance on patching applications to use multiproto -- this means you
To tune to a channel : using the patched szap above as a guide we see that
struct dvb_frontend_parameters tuneto; ... ioctl(fefd, FE_SET_FRONTEND, &tuneto);
must be replaced by
struct dvbfe_params fe_params; ... ioctl(fefd, DVBFE_SET_PARAMS, &fe_params);
where the parts of dvbfe_params.delsys relevant for the delivery system used (DVB-S/DSS/DVB-S2) need to be set before the call.
To make the userspace code a lot cleaner C preprocessor macros can be used to hide the full details of the multiproto api - here is a short example:
#if (DVB_API_VERSION==3) && (DVB_API_VERSION_MINOR>=3) #define FE_PARAM struct dvbfe_params #define IOCTL_SET_FE DVBFE_SET_PARAMS #define DVB_SET_DELIVERY(a, b) (a)->delivery=(b) #define DVBC_SET_SYMBOLRATE(a, b) (a)->delsys.dvbc.symbol_rate=(b) #else #define FE_PARAM struct dvb_frontend_parameters #define IOCTL_SET_FE FE_SET_FRONTEND #define DVB_SET_DELIVERY(a, b) do{ } while(0) #define DVBC_SET_SYMBOLRATE(a, b) (a)->u.qam.symbol_rate=(b) #endif void tune(int fefd) { FE_PARAM fparm; memset(&fparm, 0, sizeof(FE_PARM)); DVB_SET_DELIVERY(&fparm, DVBFE_DELSYS_DVBC); ... DVBC_SET_SYMBOLRATE(&fparm, symbolrate) if (ioctl(fefd, IOCTL_SET_FE, &fparm) < 0) { printf("Tuning failed"); } }
The code itself will stay clean of ifdef spaghetti and the compatibility macros can be hidden in some header file. See getstream [1] for a multiproto capable tuner coder without a single ifdef.