Talk:Main Page
I am p_Sa~~
Hello, please help me:) I have DVB - Skystar2 and Fedora 3 (Linux itv 2.6.11-1.14_FC3) I running DVB and read in dmesg next log...
PCI: setting IRQ 10 as level-triggered ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:0b.0[A] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10 drivers/media/dvb/b2c2/skystar2.c: FlexCopIIB(rev.195) chip found drivers/media/dvb/b2c2/skystar2.c: the chip has 38 hardware filters DVB: registering new adapter (SkyStar2). i2c_readbytes: i2c read error (addr 0a, err == -121) DVB: registering frontend 0 (ST STV0299 DVB-S)... i2c-sis96x version 1.0.0 sis96x_smbus 0000:00:02.1: SiS96x SMBus base address: 0x1400
tcpdump -i dvb0_0 -n -e
- DVB get 50-100 packets and go down
KaxTV
Should the entry of KaxTV not be removed in the main listing if it is discontinued and now part of Kaffeine?
Use case page for linux tv
Hello
I was thinking about creating a page that would list working solutions for various encrypted operators across the world. This would be structured something like:
- Section Country
- sub-section: Operator
- A table for budget card that would contain: software, card, CAM type, CAM brand, comments
- A likewise table for FF cards.
What do you think about such a page ?
Cheers
-- would be very helpful I find. BTW, I think we should have the wiki-typical "just do it" approach here, i.e. don't ask - if you think it'd be useful and help others, yes, write it up! --LAk loho 23:42, 24 April 2006 (CEST)
Long software list on it's own page?
Hi! I was thinking the software list on the main page gets too long. At the same time, not all software is helpful for all users (analogue, FF or budget cards). So does anyone mind if I move all links to a separate page, where there'd be comments on each program? --LAk loho 23:42, 24 April 2006 (CEST)
-- By comments, do you mean a one line description for the software or longer comments ? --Ddumont 14:23, 25 April 2006 (CEST)
I thought of something like one line for each program or maybe a table. Longer descriptions are/should be available on the individual program's page so there's no real need. --LAk loho 21:18, 29 April 2006 (CEST)