Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Necessity of Emergency Exits...
- To: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Subject: [vdr] Necessity of Emergency Exits...
- From: Karsten Müller <kmu@ratio.de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:57:32 +0200
- Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Organization: RATIO Entwicklungen GmbH
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi List, hi Klaus :)
this weekend I added a third DVB-C card to my VDR box. No problem with that
at all :) But I noticed that especially due to the "nice" weather we had
this weekend the signal quality wasn't the best which resulted in *many*
messages like these
Jul 21 19:00:02 player vdr[2292]: ERROR: video data stream broken
Jul 21 19:00:02 player vdr[2292]: initiating emergency exit
Jul 21 19:00:02 player vdr[2267]: emergency exit requested - shutting down
Jul 21 19:00:02 player vdr[2267]: saved setup to
/usr/local/src/VDRtmp/setup.conf
[ ... approx. 30 repeats of these messages... ]
Jul 21 22:52:57 player vdr[4710]: ERROR: video data stream broken
Jul 21 22:52:57 player vdr[4710]: initiating emergency exit
Jul 21 22:52:57 player vdr[2612]: emergency exit requested - shutting down
Jul 21 22:52:57 player vdr[2612]: saved setup to
/usr/local/src/VDRtmp/setup.conf
Is it *really* necessary to shutdown the *whole* vdr just because the video
stream of *one* recording is broken for a second or two ?
Wouldn't it be *much* better to "record" just a black picture or whatever
until the signal is back ?
An "emergency exit" of course affects *all* recordings on *all* cards at
that time. So if a video data stream of *one* card fails, *all* recordings
are stopped by this "emergency exit". This behaviour is very annoying and
I really don't see the necessity of handling errors like this...?
As Klaus Schmidinger stated in an earlier eMail, a DVB card should be
able to jump on a data stream at *any* given time, wouldn't it be much better
to let the card just "sit and wait" until the signal comes back maybe with a
timeout of a minute or so (*and* leaving all the other recordings
unaffected) ?
I could live with an audio/video glitch or even a missing part in *one*
particular stream which actually *was* broken but not with missing 10-20
seconds in *all* recordings...
Hopefully this behaviour will be fixed/changed in the next "plugIn'ed"
version of the VDR (?)
Anyone ?
PS: At the same time where VDR "emergency exits", my dbox f.e. just waits for
a second, displaying a message like "signal lost, blah blah..." and then
immediately continues working after the signal returns (mostly after
about 1 second)
PPS: Anyway, the VDR is still a *great* thing to have and surely beats all
of the commercial attempts of digital video recorders out there. Thanks a
lot for all your work Klaus (and all contributors of course)
- --
with best regards
- ---
Karsten Mueller
Softwaredevelopment / Keyaccount Manager
RATIO Entwicklungen GmbH
Admiralitaetstr. 59
20459 Hamburg
Email: mailto:kmu@ratio.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBPTu67Pa/7v6IZOEZAQFqxwgAs2Qlph3giUpGgMwhWVaDnlkdjlY7RU1E
gFKvGJxOJdwwfw+P3C9SD5Pt6K8uJXIIyHpKe0eTelyh9V8F82aVGZR67hMvyYBg
cuZpqbxqgav3C9D/ss+s/36UlBMr48DSHJP77BXvj9V20ntYnYuWL/lF2BohfeZo
yZFGqjqQ/k1co4X0BqjTzDArs0zhFN5k7rBbTqmsgrJ6H8+8DcpYBz3rHPT1bMxN
3/K+9LZYtoNKehNmGxinxjlGlhb2lbsfRZqRD4cOvxOVvLe1z6brzNccebT28vmp
X52MNIiiqmSic8af2dIIi7lKu/A8GTVDTE6AE43yrITXjPhTjPP17w==
=gkt5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index