[vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs
From: guiz <guiz18@ifrance.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:12:32 +0200
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
In-reply-to: <1061819327.2863.43.camel@echelon.local.wg>
References: <1A4E530F40B6D3119E880050041D6DE00412FF18@wntceda3.ceda.polimi.it><000701c36ae3$f9a44a40$0202a8c0@client02><20030825153157.3e350bed.guiz18@ifrance.com><1061819327.2863.43.camel@echelon.local.wg>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org

> > But it lacks a softcam.
> Which is only for bad boys ... ;o)
yes i know !


have you test mplayer ?

or is there a sort of plugin "vdr-mplayer" like the vdr-xine ?
_____________________________________________________________________
Envie de discuter en "live" avec vos amis ? Télécharger MSN Messenger
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/m la 1ère messagerie instantanée de France



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs
  - From: Rene Bartsch <ml@bartschnet.de>

References:
- [vdr] R: Re: Filesystem pros & cons
  - From: Barbini Uberto <Uberto.Barbini@ceda.polimi.it>
- [vdr] VDR vs other Linux PVRs
  - From: "mark.carline" <mark.carline@btinternet.com>
- [vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs
  - From: guiz <guiz18@ifrance.com>
- [vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs
  - From: Rene Bartsch <ml@bartschnet.de>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: Filesystem pros & cons
Next by Date: [vdr] Wish-list for future vdr themes (WAS: Re: VDR bug or badly written code?)
Previous by thread: [vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: VDR vs other Linux PVRs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index