vdr

vdr@linuxtv.org

6731 discussions

Running vdr with a tunerless FF card (possibly a patch request)
by Hanno Zulla 14 May '08

14 May '08

Hi, here's my setup: - one old FF DVB-C card - one new DVB-C Buget card with a CAM - another new DVB-C Budget card (but without a CAM) The FF card is too slow the handle the incoming data rates of some channels. I know about [1], but don't want to break my old card with my limited soldering skills. So I want to use the FF card as output, only. I also want to bind encrypted channels to the CAM-card. I want the system to use both cards for non-encrypted channels. How can I achieve that with vanilla vdr? (Right now, I use a patch [2] that contains the ability to turn off the FF tuner [3]. It works, but it's not an elegant solution.) Thanks, Hanno [1] http://www.escape-edv.de/endriss/dvb-full-ts-mod/ [2] http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Extensions-Patch [3] http://vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=76674

4 6

Can not view DVB-S2 channels
by NONAS EUAGGELOS 12 May '08

12 May '08

Dear All, I have a skystar hd and I am using vdr 1.7.0 with the h264 patch and xine for output device as described here: http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/OpenSUSE_VDR_DVB-S2_-_xine The only channel I am able to watch is HD Suisse. I can not watch any other dvb-s2 or h264 channel. When I zap to it I get: channel not available. These are some example channels from chanels.conf that do NOT work: SKY Sport HD 1;SkyItalia:11996:vC23M5S1Z35:S13.0E:27500:10164+164:0;416=ita,417= eng:0:919,93B:11020:64511:6400:0 Next HD;SkyItalia:11996:vC23M5S1Z35:S13.0E:27500:10160+160:0;400=ita,401=eng:0:9 19,93B:11030:64511:6400:0 SKY Cinema HD;SkyItalia:11996:vC23M5S1Z35:S13.0E:27500:10161+161:0;404=ita,405=e ng:0:919,93B:11031:64511:6400:0 NationalGeo HD;SkyItalia:11996:vC23M5S1Z35:S13.0E:27500:10163+163:0;412=ita,413= eng:0:919,93B:11032:64511:6400:0 SKY Sport HD 2;SkyItalia:11996:vC23M5S1Z35:S13.0E:27500:10165+165:0;420=eng,421= ita:0:919,93B:11033:64511:6400:0 I have copied them from the mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/vdr@linuxtv.org/msg04678.html Any help / ideas would be appreciated. Regards Vagelis

5 15

Re: [vdr] coreavc for Linux (coreavc 1.7.0 + xine patches)
by Igor 10 May '08

10 May '08

Hi can someone to run the coreavc for linux 170 with vdr 170 ? I couldn't :( Igor -----Original Message----- From: Darren Salt <linux(a)youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> To: vdr(a)linuxtv.org Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 21:58:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [vdr] coreavc for Linux (coreavc 1.7.0 + xine patches) > > I demand that Igor may or may not have written... > > [snip] > > http://groups.google.com/group/coreavc-for-linux?hl=en > > > here you can find a new patches for xine 1.1.12 > > > h264_pes.patch > > demux_ts_fixes.patch > > coreavc-xine-1.1.12_more.patch > > coreavc-xine-1.1.11.patch > > NAK. Unattributed, no summary lines, no descriptions, insufficiently and > unsuitably split up, C++ comments, strange comments such as "My Hack". There > is at least one ABI change: a struct in a public header file is changed, > which automatically makes this 1.2 material. > > Bug fixes then the h264 PES patch (without any ABI changes which are not > simple additions) sent to xine-devel if you want any of this added to > xine-lib. After that, the CoreAVC patches; one patch series against hg tip is > STRONGLY preferred. > > -- > | Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon > | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army > | Kill all extremists! > > "Bother", said Pooh, as he saw the mushroom cloud. > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr(a)linuxtv.org > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr >

1 0

error decompressing frame for Astra HD+
by Igor 10 May '08

10 May '08

Hi during watching of Astra HD+ from Astra 19,2E I always have this errors [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]B picture before any references, skipping [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]B picture before any references, skipping [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]B picture before any references, skipping [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]B picture before any references, skipping [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]B picture before any references, skipping [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]B picture before any references, skipping [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]no frame! ffmpeg_video_dec: error decompressing frame [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]non existing PPS referenced [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]non existing PPS referenced [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]non existing PPS referenced [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]non existing PPS referenced [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]non existing PPS referenced [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]non existing PPS referenced [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]decode_slice_header error [h264 @ 0xabfba3d0]no frame! ffmpeg_video_dec: error decompressing frame 200 frames delivered, 31 frames skipped, 52 frames discarded video_out: throwing away image with pts 120676128 because it's too old (diff : 25806). video_out: throwing away image with pts 120690172 because it's too old (diff : 43300). video_out: throwing away image with pts 120711478 because it's too old (diff : 73586). vdr: osdflush: n: 4, 76.7, timeout: 0, result: 0 video_out: throwing away image with pts 120732839 because it's too old (diff : 104127). I think it's ffmpeg's problem, but I don't know how can I solve it. It seems to me, nobody from ffmpeg-devel list doesn't want to fix it. Has somebody experience with this problem ? Igor

3 7

VDR constantly adding and deleting filters
by Anssi Hannula 10 May '08

10 May '08

Hi all! While debugging another issue, I noticed (ADDF/DELF streamdev traffic) that VDR is constantly adding and deleting filters in cPatFilter::Process(). As I don't know of this filter stuff, I ask here: Is this correct behaviour? It probably is, but I just want to be sure :) Below is a log excerpt with the attached patch: > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 264, Index = 7, Sid = 4417 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 256, pmtIndex = 1, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 257, Index = 3, Sid = 97 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 256, pmtIndex = 0, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 257, Index = 2, Sid = 273 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 264, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 266, Index = 8, Sid = 4481 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 257, pmtIndex = 2, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 264, Index = 4, Sid = 209 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 257, pmtIndex = 1, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:42 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 258, Index = 3, Sid = 289 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 266, pmtIndex = 7, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 265, Index = 9, Sid = 4433 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1150, pmtIndex = 4, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Adding, pmtPid 1151, Index = 6, Sid = 1187 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 264, pmtIndex = 3, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 260, Index = 5, Sid = 257 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 258, pmtIndex = 2, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 259, Index = 4, Sid = 305 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 260, pmtIndex = 4, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 261, Index = 6, Sid = 241 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 259, pmtIndex = 3, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 261, Index = 5, Sid = 353 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 265, pmtIndex = 8, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 263, Index = 10, Sid = 4401 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1151, pmtIndex = 5, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 261, pmtIndex = 5, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 259, Index = 7, Sid = 177 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Adding, pmtPid 1119, Index = 7, Sid = 1190 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 261, pmtIndex = 4, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 262, Index = 6, Sid = 385 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 259, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 262, pmtIndex = 5, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 263, Index = 7, Sid = 369 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 263, pmtIndex = 9, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 258, Index = 1, Sid = 65 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1119, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Adding, pmtPid 1154, Index = 8, Sid = 1354 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 263, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 260, Index = 8, Sid = 337 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 256, Index = 1, Sid = 17 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 258, pmtIndex = 0, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 256, Index = 2, Sid = 49 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 256, pmtIndex = 0, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 257, Index = 2, Sid = 33 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 260, pmtIndex = 7, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 256, pmtIndex = 1, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 257, Index = 3, Sid = 97 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1154, pmtIndex = 7, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Adding, pmtPid 1144, Index = 9, Sid = 1380 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 257, pmtIndex = 1, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 259, Index = 3, Sid = 81 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 256, Index = 1, Sid = 225 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 257, pmtIndex = 2, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 264, Index = 4, Sid = 209 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 259, pmtIndex = 2, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 260, Index = 4, Sid = 129 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 256, pmtIndex = 0, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 257, Index = 2, Sid = 273 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 264, pmtIndex = 3, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 260, Index = 5, Sid = 257 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1144, pmtIndex = 8, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30679] Adding, pmtPid 1145, Index = 10, Sid = 1510 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 260, pmtIndex = 3, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 258, Index = 5, Sid = 145 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 260, pmtIndex = 4, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 261, Index = 6, Sid = 241 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 257, pmtIndex = 1, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 258, Index = 3, Sid = 289 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 258, pmtIndex = 4, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:43 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 261, Index = 6, Sid = 4369 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 261, pmtIndex = 5, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 259, Index = 7, Sid = 177 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 258, pmtIndex = 2, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 259, Index = 4, Sid = 305 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 261, pmtIndex = 5, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 264, Index = 7, Sid = 4417 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 259, pmtIndex = 3, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 261, Index = 5, Sid = 353 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30682] Deleting, pmtPid 259, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 261, pmtIndex = 4, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 262, Index = 6, Sid = 385 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1145, pmtIndex = 9, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30679] Adding, pmtPid 1146, Index = 11, Sid = 1520 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 264, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 266, Index = 8, Sid = 4481 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30682] Adding, pmtPid 258, Index = 1, Sid = 65 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 262, pmtIndex = 5, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 263, Index = 7, Sid = 369 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 266, pmtIndex = 7, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 265, Index = 9, Sid = 4433 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Deleting, pmtPid 263, pmtIndex = 6, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30685] Adding, pmtPid 260, Index = 8, Sid = 337 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Deleting, pmtPid 265, pmtIndex = 8, lastPmtScan = 0 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30688] Adding, pmtPid 263, Index = 10, Sid = 4401 > May 6 05:18:44 epsilon vdr: [30679] Deleting, pmtPid 1146, pmtIndex = 10, lastPmtScan = 0 -- Anssi Hannula Index: vdr-1.6.0-sechand/pat.c =================================================================== --- vdr-1.6.0-sechand/pat.c +++ vdr-1.6.0-sechand/pat.c 2008-05-06 05:08:48.000000000 +0300 @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ if (Pid == 0x00) { if (Tid == 0x00) { if (pmtPid && time(NULL) - lastPmtScan > PMT_SCAN_TIMEOUT) { + dsyslog("Deleting, pmtPid %d, pmtIndex = %d, lastPmtScan = %lu", pmtPid, pmtIndex, lastPmtScan); Del(pmtPid, 0x02); pmtPid = 0; pmtIndex++; @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ if (Index++ >= pmtIndex && Channels.GetByServiceID(Source(), Transponder(), assoc.getServiceId())) { pmtPid = assoc.getPid(); pmtSid = assoc.getServiceId(); + dsyslog("Adding, pmtPid %d, Index = %d, Sid = %d", pmtPid, Index, pmtSid); Add(pmtPid, 0x02); break; }

2 1

TS recordings?
by Teemu Suikki 09 May '08

09 May '08

Sorry if I'm asking FAQ's, I tried to search the old articles but there was no clear answer.. I have been trying to watch vdr recordings with PS3, through fuppes and/or mediatomb upnp servers. It sort of "works" through transcoding PES->TS or PES->PS, but it feels slow and jerky when compared to formats natively supported by PS3.. Anyway, there have been articles about vdr supporting TS recording at some point, how is this going? This would be ideal for me, because mpeg-ts does work with PS3. Also I found the ts-recording patch, but this is not really a solution for me because I need to watch the same recordings with VDR as well, and it's not practical to use double space for both .ts and .vdr formats.. So VDR would need to support TS playback as well. -- Teemu Suikki http://www.z-power.fi/

4 6

vdr-reelchannelscan plugin
by lucian orasanu 08 May '08

08 May '08

Hy. >Hi >I have one reject >reelchannelscan-0.4.1# cat >vdr-reelchannelscan-h264-multiproto.diff | patch >patching file filter.c >patching file i18n.c >patching file transponders.c >Hunk #1 succeeded at 119 with fuzz 1. >Hunk #2 FAILED at 221. >1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >transponders.c.rej > > >transponders.c.rej > >*** 221,229 **** > > // printf (DBG " SetTerrTransponderData(s:%d,f: %d >,BW: %d, mod %d, Hier %d\n,fec_h %d/l %d,G %d,T %d ", >type, > // frequency_, bandwidth_, >modulation_, hierarchy_, fec_h_, fec_l_, guard_, >transmission_); >- return c->SetTerrTransponderData(type, frequency_, >bandwidth_, modulation_, hierarchy_, fec_h_, >- fec_l_, guard_, >transmission_);// >- > } > //----------- Class cCableTransponder >------------------------------ Hi I have one reject reelchannelscan-0.4.1# cat vdr-reelchannelscan-h264-multiproto.diff | patch patching file filter.c patching file i18n.c patching file transponders.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 119 with fuzz 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 221. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file transponders.c.rej transponders.c.rej *** 221,229 **** // printf (DBG " SetTerrTransponderData(s:%d,f: %d ,BW: %d, mod %d, Hier %d\n,fec_h %d/l %d,G %d,T %d ", type, // frequency_, bandwidth_, modulation_, hierarchy_, fec_h_, fec_l_, guard_, transmission_); - return c->SetTerrTransponderData(type, frequency_, bandwidth_, modulation_, hierarchy_, fec_h_, - fec_l_, guard_, transmission_);// - } //----------- Class cCableTransponder ------------------------------ reelchannelscan from here http://www.reelbox.org/software/source/vdr-plugins/vdr-reelchannelscan-0.4.… Igor >reelchannelscan from here >http://www.reelbox.org/software/source/vdr-plugins/vdr-reelchannelscan-0.4.… >Igor I dont understend why wen I run diff -ruN it make the patch at ***221,229***, because in mc it shwos ***224*** position. I make it with diff -ruN ./notpatched ./patched. where 'patched' and 'notpatched' are directory with the plugin ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

1 0

Xineliboutput segmentation fault
by Graziano Pavone 08 May '08

08 May '08

Hallo, I'm using xineliboutput as an output device, both on the main VDR server (that is attached to a 16:9 display) and over network to a client, with no DVB cards, but that connect over the network to the main server VDR with xineliboutput. Everything is working fine, but if I select "crop letterbox 4:3 to 16:9" on the main VDR machine, I get a segmentation fault on the client when I try to run xineliboutput everytime I try to run it, until I remove the "crop letterbox" option. Maybe I'm missing some library on the client? anyone can help me about this? Thanks, Graziano

4 8

Re: [vdr] vdr-xine: Client connect failed!
by Simon Baxter 07 May '08

07 May '08

oops > I'm trying to downgrade vdr-xine from 0.8.2 back to 0.8.0 but get vdr-xine: Client connect failed! in std-out. Can this be further diagnosed? The xine-lib and xine-ui seem to otherwise work just fine, just won't connect to vdr-xine. Thanks Simon

2 3

vdr-reelchannelscan plugin
by lucian orasanu 07 May '08

07 May '08

Hey. 10x for reply and for advices. patch is for vdr-reelchannelscan-0.4.1 . ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

2 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

vdr