Re: [vdr] Centralized 'thread active' handling

On 13 Aug 2005 Klaus Schmidinger Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de wrote:

Stefan Huelswitt wrote:

...

Wouldn't it be better to leave Active() untouched (instead of renaming to Running()) and create a new (differently named) function for the active var replacement? (e.g. Continue(), which would give good readability with while(Continue()))

Well, Active() reflects the internal 'active' variable, so Continue() would have to correspond to 'continue', which is a reserved keyword...

This is after your change, but before Active() didn't reflected any internal variable. I don't know if one must build such a strict rule ...

Just my two cents.

Regards.