On Tuesday 13 September 2005 19:01, Carsten Koch wrote:
I wonder if it would be an improvement of that strategy if VDR only took the summary from the timer entry if it is not much shorter than the summary from the related EPG data.
The length of the description is not always a good criterion for being up-to-date. Some providers send a standard description and replace it a few days before the event with something thats up-to-date but perhaps shorter.
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 18:10, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
delimiting character that separates 'description' from 'comment', as in
...:Description of what happens#some arbitrary comment
where '#' would be that new delimiter. Everything before the delimiter would go into the 'description', and everything after it would simply be stored and otherwise ignored by VDR.
The delimiter could be a problem, but what about a sequence like CR#CR? Can't imagine, that this is part of a description. Another question: Would this comment be absolutely invisible in VDR (in timers and recordings summary)? If so, will there be a method like cTimer::Comment(), so that plugins could also use it? Would be great! ;-)
Christian