Am Freitag, 18. März 2005 22:48 schrieb Matthias Lötzke:
Markus_Ehrnsperger@yahoo.de says...
so if I switch from
S19.2E 99999 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 T
to
S13E 99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
than the second DVB card will switch the tone off (while the first one is still sending the tone), the second DVB card will have low voltage (while the first one has still high voltage), than the second DVB card will send some DiSEqC sequences (disturbed by the tone of the first one) and will switch the tone on again. Than the first DVB card will send signals, again disturbed by the tone of the second DVB card.
Would it be possible to change this and make sure no DVB card sends the tone as long as DiSEqC sequences are sent?
I will check this. Until now I implemented most of the LNB-sharing functions in device.c and tried to avoid changes in lower abstraction levels. If this does not need large changes to vdr or too many dirty hacks I will implement this in a future version.
For the moment a simple line-splitter (like http://www.reichelt.de/index.html?ARTIKEL=SVE%202-01;ARTIKELID=24943; ) should work for your configuration, as it passes the LNB-configuration- tones of only one card (AFAIK).
Hi Matthias,
thank you for writing this patch and looking at my issues. I have a similar splitter and the two reciever connectors are looking symmetrically, so I don't see through which one the DiSEqC sequences could be blocked. This should also be printed on the line-splitter. Has anyone here on the list some confirmed information on this issue, how such a line splitter works?
And another question to the list: Anyone using this patch with more than two LNBs? Does it work for you?
Since I have some other issues with my SS2 card I have deactivated it for now. If you work again on the DiSEqC handling and think I should test it, please just write an E-Mail, I can reactivate my SS2 card than.
Markus
Matthias.
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr