25 Mar
2013
25 Mar
'13
4:22 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:09 AM, EikeSauer@t-online.de EikeSauer@t-online.de wrote:
Klaus said that he thinks about internal livebuffer functionality in VDR after 2.0.
There have been discussions here about the best way to add it to VDR. As long as it can be turned off and/or sent to ram instead of harddisk, I think it would be a great feature to add. While I couldn't care less about livebuffer personally, it does seem to be a popular wish-list item. I'd even say up there with solid native client/server support.