Dieter Hametner dh+vdr@gekrumbel.de writes:
Hi,
I couldn't run properly vdr 171 + s2api + extension patch + s2api patch + h.264patch that's why I keep vdr 170 + s2api patch + h.264patch
There's a git repository for vdr at http://git.gekrumbel.de/?p=vdr.git Wouldn't it be appropriate to use it to maintain a working vdr+s2+h264 source tree ?
I'm maintaining that aforementioned git repository. I didn't want to host different versions of VDR in this git repository (except the 'original sources' git).
Ok, sorry I should have asked you first. BTW is it used by a lot of people ?
This repository is intended to be used as a source for cloning own git repositories and pulling upcoming development changes provided by Klaus Schmidinger. If you clone it to a public git hoster (or publish it on some own server) and add the various patches (s2api, h.264 etc.), it will be easy for others to retrieve already patched versions of VDR to their local computers.
If I get informed of such a repository I will be happy to add a link on my VDR git hosting site, to inform others about the patched VDR git existence.
Look at git homepage http://git.or.cz/ for a list of public git hosting providers.
ok. I'm not a h264 or s2api user yet, it would be very nice if some people could maintain such a repository. It's seem messy to get these patches working and questions about them are very recurrent.