On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:39:43PM +0100, Patrick Rother wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 02:21:07PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 21.03.2009 14:17, Artur Skawina wrote:
Patrick Rother wrote:
For a reason not to go in details too much here, I would like to make vdr recognise sparse DVB adapter numbers.
I have:
root@vdr:/dev/dvb# ls -l total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 200 Mar 19 11:59 adapter0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 120 Mar 19 11:59 adapter1/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 120 Mar 19 11:59 adapter5/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 120 Mar 19 11:59 adapter6/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 120 Mar 19 11:59 adapter7/ root@vdr:/dev/dvb#
But vdr uses only the first two devices.
Is there any easy possibility to patch the code accordingly?
./vdr -D 0 -D 1 -D 5 -D 6 -D 7
I'm afraid this won't work, because VDR stops scaning for DVB devices as soon as it hits a gap.
You might want to try changing this function:
bool cDvbDevice::Initialize(void) { int found = 0; int i; for (i = 0; i < MAXDVBDEVICES; i++) { if (UseDevice(NextCardIndex())) { if (Probe(*cDvbName(DEV_DVB_FRONTEND, i))) { new cDvbDevice(i); found++; } else NextCardIndex(1); // skips this one <=========== changed line } else NextCardIndex(1); // skips this one } NextCardIndex(MAXDVBDEVICES - i); // skips the rest if (found > 0) isyslog("found %d video device%s", found, found > 1 ? "s" : ""); else isyslog("no DVB device found"); return found > 0; }
Untested, don't know if it will actually work as expected.
I will test this and let you know.
Thank you!
This seems not to work.
Does anybody have another idea?
Thank you.