24 Mar
2005
24 Mar
'05
1:14 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0100, Gr?goire Favre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:03:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
yep, that's my next step...to make it do a good quality two-pass transcoding.
Any reason not to do three-pass ? Even with your actual version you do three-pass :-)
yeah, i noticed that.
even with the default settings as in the script, the quality is reasonable. artifacts are only really noticable in graphics and lettering on signs etc.
And with respect to size ?
about 400-450MB per hour, which is a lot better than ~3GB/hour.
that's for the one-pass version. haven't actually tried the two (three :) pass version yet.
craig
--
craig sanders cas@taz.net.au (part time cyborg)