14 May
2011
14 May
'11
11:06 a.m.
On 13.05.2011 23:47, Udo Richter wrote:
Am 13.05.2011 07:44, schrieb Tobi:
Interestingly irritating... Since I don't have an GCC4.6 at hand, I *think* the source of the problem might be that cCursesFont has just an default constructor.
Right. The C++ standard explicitly requires an "user-declared default constructor" here.
So it should also work if you add an empty constructor cCursesFont::cCursesFont() { } ???
Yes. Either this or -fpermissive. But personally I prefer the initializer here, but I must admit I don't understand the technical reason, why the standard requires a user defined default constructor at all.
Tobias