19 Apr
2007
19 Apr
'07
8:55 a.m.
On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:41, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the difference between "-vo dfb:" & "-vo dfb:mgatv" I can't really say what difference this would make.
I belive this is entirely dependent on what xine instance you're using with xinelib. Are you using df_xine? I think it should handle field parity correctly.
--
Torgeir Veimo
torgeir@pobox.com