Ed from PVRWeb wrote:
After some Googling I've found another web site mirroring this list (http://pvrweb.com). I think the mirror is auto created, but the
generated
threads contains all the sender mail addresses for followup messages in clear text.
Just to make this clear... All the incoming messages have the email addresses changed so they will read 'name at address.com' so this will not get picked up by most spam systems. I think this is the same procedure used by the published copy on the main site.
Where this idea failed was that in the message in question someone had included the email address in the message. I am looking into scanning the messages for email addresses without messing up code fragments now.
I believe that it is no big thing to include "support" for "email at host" in email-collector robots. If "email at host" is the general format to "protect" against robots it will no longer be a protection.
The question is if the sender adress has to be to be published in any form? I think an archive is more suitable for just following previous threads than contacting someone months or years later.
Regards Peter
http://vaasa.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pjuszack/digicam - My VDR and plugins