Hello,
I tried the usage of vdr with the --edit parameter and the habbit of vdr looks a bit strange to me:
When i use only the --edit parameter, vdr will fail and the log claims, that the given recording is not found below the default video-dir (/var/lib/video.00).
When I use vdr with a video-dir not contained in the path of the recording, the same happens.
So to cut a recording, I need to use --edit='/path/to/recording' and -v path (with path being a part of '/path/to/recording') which I think is quite a bit of redundant.
What about the situation, where the recording is on a read-only mounted drive and the video-dir given by -v option is the path to a local writable directory? Is it really necessary, that source-recording and target-recording are on the same path?
Is it very expensive to support different write location than the read location?
kind regards
Gero