Op Zo, 31 mei, 2009 11:47, schreef Magnus Hörlin:
Seppo Ingalsuo wrote: I have to agree that the vdpau deinterlacers are better than the tvtime ones, including the temporal only deinterlacer that is used for 1080i. But it is as you say a little annoying that paused images are not deinterlaced. I use the ION platform with 9400M. /Magnus H
Yes, the deinterlacer works much nicer in combination with VDPAU. But with VDPAU I have two issues and this is why I haven't upgraded to VDPAU completely as off yet:
1. The maximum usage through VDPAU is in my case an additional 50W (compared to the ExtensionHD with a maximum of 10W) because I've got a PCI-e based videocard; 2. Using plugins like vdr-xine and/or xineliboutput you have buffering time which is annoying for zap speeds on encrypted channels.
Currently I use the Reel-VDR fork and it seems to work quite nicely. And it doesn't require many patches to get it working, only some S2API based patches.
Regards,
Niels Wagenaar
Hi,
Niels Wagenaar schrieb:
- Using plugins like vdr-xine and/or xineliboutput you have buffering
time which is annoying for zap speeds on encrypted channels.
Here you can find the changeset which is responsible for the buffering issue.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4A15672E.5090908%40...
If you revert the changeset, zapping should behave as usual.
Bye.
On Sunday 31 of May 2009, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
Currently I use the Reel-VDR fork and it seems to work quite nicely. And it doesn't require many patches to get it working, only some S2API based patches.
Regards,
Niels Wagenaar
Please could you send patches you are using (especially for reelvdr and s2api)?
Thanks
BR,
Ales