I am currently testing VDRAdmin-0.97-AM3.2 and noticed that the recording summaries are blank when using vdr-1.3.25. Has anyone already generated a patch to fix this?
Best Regards,
Hello,
On 2005-06-01 at 05:37 CEST C.Y.M wrote:
I am currently testing VDRAdmin-0.97-AM3.2 and noticed that the recording summaries are blank when using vdr-1.3.25. Has anyone already generated a patch to fix this?
http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?postid=315466#post315466
Mike
Mike Constabel wrote:
Hello,
On 2005-06-01 at 05:37 CEST C.Y.M wrote:
I am currently testing VDRAdmin-0.97-AM3.2 and noticed that the recording summaries are blank when using vdr-1.3.25. Has anyone already generated a patch to fix this?
http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?postid=315466#post315466
Thanks, this seems to partially fix the problem. This patch seems to only work with recordings that exists at the top level of the video directory.
Best Regards,
Hello,
On 2005-06-01 at 10:23 CEST C.Y.M wrote:
http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?postid=315466#post315466
Thanks, this seems to partially fix the problem. This patch seems to only work with recordings that exists at the top level of the video directory.
vdradmin gets this Summary via "svdrp lstr", not by reading the file directly. So vdradmin doesn't know where the recording lies. Do you get the correct detail if you do a "svdrpsend lstr <record-id>"?
Mike
Mike Constabel wrote:
Hello,
On 2005-06-01 at 10:23 CEST C.Y.M wrote:
http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?postid=315466#post315466
Thanks, this seems to partially fix the problem. This patch seems to only work with recordings that exists at the top level of the video directory.
vdradmin gets this Summary via "svdrp lstr", not by reading the file directly. So vdradmin doesn't know where the recording lies. Do you get the correct detail if you do a "svdrpsend lstr <record-id>"?
Yes, "svdrpsend lstr <record-id>" works fine. I have a feeling the bug is in "sub rec_list" not "sub rec_detail". When I browse in a subdirectory of the video directory, the name of the recording is not visible (so I can not select it to view the summary). Although, I can select the "rename" and "delete" buttons and they both work.
/video/recording_name/2005-05-29.19:30.50.98.rec (visible) /video/recording_name/_/2005-05-29.19:30.50.98.rec (not visible) /video/recording_name/%_/2005-05-29.19:30.50.98.rec (not visible)
Best Regards,
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 13:02, C.Y.M wrote:
Yes, "svdrpsend lstr <record-id>" works fine. I have a feeling the bug is in "sub rec_list" not "sub rec_detail". When I browse in a subdirectory of the video directory, the name of the recording is not visible (so I can not select it to view the summary). Although, I can select the "rename" and "delete" buttons and they both work.
You're right, I think this has to do because Klaus changed the output of "lstr".
/video/recording_name/2005-05-29.19:30.50.98.rec (visible)
Right.
/video/recording_name/_/2005-05-29.19:30.50.98.rec (not visible)
Right, because "_" means " " and so the recording's name only prints a space (that one can't click).
/video/recording_name/%_/2005-05-29.19:30.50.98.rec (not visible)
No, it's visible here, but only the "%".
I'll have to make some thoughts on how to fix...
Regards, Andreas