On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:41:15 +0100 Darren Salt linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk wrote:
...
I'm inclined to believe the latter: you keep forgetting. :-)
Well, I'd put the header problem somewhere between "didn't even think of it" and "can't do it with my emailer" (at least after a quick check and a couple of attempts), sorry...
Yes, could be an X (openchrome) problem, could be xxmc or the HW decoding, I'm a bit at loss with it at the moment. With Xv the quality is just fine (but CPU at around 60-70%, a bit too touchy for other activity). The xxmc is somewhat blurry and jumping a bit with the tickers, with CPU at 30%. Any similar experience/solutions anyone? The hardware is CN700 (EPIA EN-12000).
Well, maybe I should actually start another thread on this (with proper headers on the replys :-) ), or maybe at openchrome or xine...
I was (not really that optimistically) thinking that maybe the <<1.1.3 meant something horrible happens at higher versions... but I wasn't really expecting a positive answer on that. And it does seem that not much has happened with xine xxmc recently.
Ok, thanks for the info, maybe I'll try a newer version at some stage...
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:15 +0200 Timo Laitinen timolai@utu.fi wrote:
All XvMC implementations that I know of have poor deinterlacing, which makes them pretty useless for decoding interlaced video. Your description suggests that openchrome just drops the other field, so you lose half of both the vertical resolution and temporal definition (50 fields/s -> 25 frames/s). Continuous small skips (at regular or seemingly random intervals) could also be caused by a refresh-rate mismatch, but if Xv is ok, this is not the main problem in your case.
Regards,
Niko Mikkilä