Hi Klaus,
is there a chance to have this patch
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have it in core VDR.
BR,
Christian
/vote: yes
a really useful patch.
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:47:32 +0100, Christian Wieninger cwieninger@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Klaus,
is there a chance to have this patch
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have it in core VDR.
BR,
Christian
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 02/05/08 09:47, Christian Wieninger wrote:
Hi Klaus,
is there a chance to have this patch
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have it in core VDR.
The main menu handling will be revised at some point, anyway, so that the user can take complete control over its content. Therefore I am not going to adopt this at this time.
Klaus
-----Original Message----- From: vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of Klaus Schmidinger Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:37 AM To: vdr@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?
On 02/05/08 09:47, Christian Wieninger wrote:
Hi Klaus,
is there a chance to have this patch
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have
it in core VDR.
The main menu handling will be revised at some point, anyway, so that the user can take complete control over its content. Therefore I am not going to adopt this at this time.
Will the integration of this (and other similar patches) harm in any way? I do not see why they could not be used to provide an apparently missing functionallity until you find the time to revise the code the way you like. The code is used widely, it is already available as a patch and you can still revise it any time you want...
Best regards, Reiner.
2008/2/5, Reiner Buehl reiner@buehl.net:
Will the integration of this (and other similar patches) harm in any way?
Yes. A stable version needs a feature freeze to get stable. Otherwise we could continue as before.
Regards, Joachim.
Joachim Wilke wrote:
2008/2/5, Reiner Buehl reiner@buehl.net:
Will the integration of this (and other similar patches) harm in any way?
Yes. A stable version needs a feature freeze to get stable. Otherwise we could continue as before.
this was the reason to ask now, since we do not already have the stable 1.6.0 ;-) The patch is one year old and well tested.
Regards,
Christian
2008/2/5, Christian Wieninger cwieninger@gmx.de:
this was the reason to ask now, since we do not already have the stable 1.6.0 ;-)
Perhaps you don't know, but a feature freeze is always _before_ the release of a stable version, otherwise this would not be a stable version.
Best Regards, Joachim.
-
Christian Wieninger -
Frank Enderle -
Joachim Wilke -
Klaus Schmidinger -
Reiner Buehl