Hello,
just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which fails if I don't use this :
--- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <pwd.h> #include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <linux/types.h> #include <sys/capability.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <termios.h>
Happy VDR :-)
Hi,
I've recently had a problem too. I resolved it like that (i don't know if the compilation error was the same as mine...) :
Add this line to the Makefile of VDR :
DEFINES += -D_GNU_SOURCE *+DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES * DEFINES += -DVIDEODIR="$(VIDEODIR)"
Cheers.
2009/3/3 Gregoire Favre gregoire.favre@gmail.com
Hello,
just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which fails if I don't use this :
--- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <pwd.h> #include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <linux/types.h> #include <sys/capability.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <termios.h>
Happy VDR :-)
Grégoire FAVRE http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com http://www.gnupg.org http://picasaweb.google.com/Gregoire.Favre
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
Hello,
just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which fails if I don't use this :
--- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <pwd.h> #include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <linux/types.h> #include <sys/capability.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <termios.h>
vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of v4l-dvb from linuxtv.org (6bd427caa0cb).
I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in
http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html
However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still persists with the current version.
Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?
Klaus
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger < Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de> wrote:
On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
Hello,
just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which fails if I don't use this :
--- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <pwd.h> #include <signal.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <linux/types.h> #include <sys/capability.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <termios.h>
vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of v4l-dvb from linuxtv.org (6bd427caa0cb).
I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in
http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html
However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still persists with the current version.
Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?
I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19
Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile: DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES
Klaus
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de mailto:Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de> wrote:
On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote: > Hello, > > just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which > fails if I don't use this : > > --- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 > +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > #include <pwd.h> > #include <signal.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > #include <sys/capability.h> > #include <sys/prctl.h> > #include <termios.h> vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of v4l-dvb from linuxtv.org <http://linuxtv.org> (6bd427caa0cb). I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still persists with the current version. Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19
Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile: DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES
Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here. There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20). That one has nothing to do with the driver.
@Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there any patches involved? Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?
@Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the one I reported?
Klaus
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Klaus Schmidinger < Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de> wrote:
On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de mailto:Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>
wrote:
On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote: > Hello, > > just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which > fails if I don't use this : > > --- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 > +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > #include <pwd.h> > #include <signal.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > #include <sys/capability.h> > #include <sys/prctl.h> > #include <termios.h> vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of v4l-dvb from linuxtv.org <http://linuxtv.org> (6bd427caa0cb). I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still persists with the current version. Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19
Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile: DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES
Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here. There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20). That one has nothing to do with the driver.
@Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there any patches involved? Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?
@Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the one I reported?
I refer to your problem with many redefinitions like the following:
/usr/include/sys/select.h:78: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct fd_set fd_set' /usr/include/linux/types.h:12: error: 'fd_set' has a previous declaration as 'typedef struct __kernel_fd_set fd_set'
I probably missed Gregorie's error report, so I don't know what was it about.
Klaus
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:52:03PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here. There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20). That one has nothing to do with the driver.
@Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there any patches involved?
If I remember right I got the same problem with plain vanille 1.7.4 but right now I use :
-rw-r--r-- 1 greg greg 23K 2009-01-26 00:34 p1-1.7.4-hlcutter-0.2.1.diff -rw-r--r-- 1 greg greg 50K 2009-01-25 23:23 p1-1.7.4-liemikuutio-1.23.diff -rw-r--r-- 1 greg greg 1.6K 2009-01-26 00:44 p1-cuttime-vdr-1.7.3.diff
Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?
My fix is just a little hack, I am not a real programmer, and yes I can compil the whole VDR (didn't take the time to fix graphlcd).
My kernel is 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 but if I remenber right I didn't had this error with previous kernel).
Thank for VDR ;-)
Gregoire Favre wrote:
Hello,
just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which fails if I don't use this :
[...]
This is because of a kernel regression: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.3/00411.html
A set of patches fixing this is available here: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.3/00955.html and here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=shor...
Specifically, the one fixing the breakage in DVB headers is "make most exported headers use strict integer types", i.e.: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=comm...
I do wonder why it hasn't yet been pushed into Torvalds' tree (it has been over a week since the patches were published), though.
-
Alex Betis -
Anssi Hannula -
Gregoire Favre -
Klaus Schmidinger -
Sébastien Serra