Luca, It is just to remind you that vdr is updated (1.7.27 is now), and that impossible to compile actuator plugin against new vdr. I do like your plugin, it very useful for channel's scanning. It is better than other scanner pluging I tried. Pls, find some time! ;-)
Regards,
Yarema
17 січня 2012 р. 13:28 Luca Olivetti luca@ventoso.org написав:
Al 17/01/12 00:39, En/na YUP ha escrit:
Hi Luca,
Maybe it is a right time to update your actuator plugin. There are some
changes in vdr-1.7.23, it is enough to change SystemValues to SystemValuesSat to compile vdr-actuator against the last vdr-1.7.23, or simply:
sed -i -e "s/SystemValues/SystemValuesSat/" actuator.c
I'm still using 1.7.21, not much time to upgrade vdr right now.
Bye
Luca
Al 26/03/12 18:56, En/na YUP ha escrit:
Luca, It is just to remind you that vdr is updated (1.7.27 is now), and that impossible to compile actuator plugin against new vdr. I do like your plugin, it very useful for channel's scanning. It is better than other scanner pluging I tried. Pls, find some time! ;-)
I'm really sorry, but I have even less time now :-( I think I won't have time to touch this at least until summer.
Bye
Regards,
Yarema
17 січня 2012 р. 13:28 Luca Olivetti <luca@ventoso.org mailto:luca@ventoso.org> написав:
Al 17/01/12 00:39, En/na YUP ha escrit: > Hi Luca, > > Maybe it is a right time to update your actuator plugin. There are some changes in vdr-1.7.23, it is enough to change SystemValues to SystemValuesSat to compile vdr-actuator against the last vdr-1.7.23, or simply: > sed -i -e "s/SystemValues/SystemValuesSat/" actuator.c I'm still using 1.7.21, not much time to upgrade vdr right now. Bye -- Luca
Hi,
On 26 March 2012 20:58, Luca Olivetti luca@ventoso.org wrote:
Al 26/03/12 18:56, En/na YUP ha escrit:
Luca, It is just to remind you that vdr is updated (1.7.27 is now), and that impossible to compile actuator plugin against new vdr. I do like your plugin, it very useful for channel's scanning. It is better than other scanner pluging I tried. Pls, find some time! ;-)
I'm really sorry, but I have even less time now :-( I think I won't have time to touch this at least until summer.
Where is the latest actuator plugin source? It should be fairly easy to rebase it on top of 1.7.27 api changes.
It is just to remind you that vdr is updated (1.7.27 is now), and that impossible to compile actuator plugin against new vdr. I do like your plugin, it very useful for channel's scanning. It is better than other scanner pluging I tried. Pls, find some time! ;-)
I'm really sorry, but I have even less time now :-( I think I won't have time to touch this at least until summer.
Where is the latest actuator plugin source? It should be fairly easy to rebase it on top of 1.7.27 api changes.
It was trivial to make the SystemValuesSat update that you suggested, but of course, this still needs VDR to be patched with the rotor patch that adds cDvbTuner::SendDiseqcCmd to dvbdevice.c
https://github.com/oldmanuk/rotorng/
Has anyone asked Klaus to accept the rotor patch (rebased onto vanilla VDR sources) or for him to provide his own implementation of a public method on dvbdevice for sending diseqc commands from plugins?
I managed to build actuator plugin. As it was stated by Klaus, "Any plugins that implement cStatus::ChannelSwitch() need to add the parameter 'bool LiveView' to that function." So it is enough to add "bool LiveView" , for details please see my PKGBUILD https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42711.
Regards,
Yarema
27 березня 2012 р. 14:55 Dominic Evans oldmanuk@gmail.com написав:
It is just to remind you that vdr is updated (1.7.27 is now), and that
impossible to compile actuator plugin against new vdr. I do like your plugin, it very useful for channel's scanning. It is better than other scanner pluging I tried. Pls, find some time! ;-)
I'm really sorry, but I have even less time now :-( I think I won't have time to touch this at least until summer.
Where is the latest actuator plugin source? It should be fairly easy to rebase it on top of 1.7.27 api changes.
It was trivial to make the SystemValuesSat update that you suggested, but of course, this still needs VDR to be patched with the rotor patch that adds cDvbTuner::SendDiseqcCmd to dvbdevice.c
https://github.com/oldmanuk/rotorng/
Has anyone asked Klaus to accept the rotor patch (rebased onto vanilla VDR sources) or for him to provide his own implementation of a public method on dvbdevice for sending diseqc commands from plugins?
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Al 27/03/2012 15:29, En/na YUP ha escrit:
I managed to build actuator plugin. As it was stated by Klaus, "Any plugins that implement cStatus::ChannelSwitch() need to add the parameter 'bool LiveView' to that function." So it is enough to add "bool LiveView" , for details please see my PKGBUILD https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42711.
Cool!, I hope to remember it when I'll have the time to update the plugin.
Bye
On 27 March 2012 13:55, Dominic Evans oldmanuk@gmail.com wrote:
It is just to remind you that vdr is updated (1.7.27 is now), and that impossible to compile actuator plugin against new vdr. I do like your plugin, it very useful for channel's scanning. It is better than other scanner pluging I tried. Pls, find some time! ;-)
I'm really sorry, but I have even less time now :-( I think I won't have time to touch this at least until summer.
Where is the latest actuator plugin source? It should be fairly easy to rebase it on top of 1.7.27 api changes.
It was trivial to make the SystemValuesSat update that you suggested, but of course, this still needs VDR to be patched with the rotor patch that adds cDvbTuner::SendDiseqcCmd to dvbdevice.c
https://github.com/oldmanuk/rotorng/
Has anyone asked Klaus to accept the rotor patch (rebased onto vanilla VDR sources) or for him to provide his own implementation of a public method on dvbdevice for sending diseqc commands from plugins?
Ah I realise now that someone sent me the rotorng sources rather than the actuator plugin.
Which is the superior of these two?
Al 27/03/12 16:35, En/na Dominic Evans ha escrit:
Ah I realise now that someone sent me the rotorng sources rather than the actuator plugin.
Which is the superior of these two?
They're different: "actuator" controls an "old style" 36V actuator, using a relay board connected to the parallel port, while "rotor" drives a diseqc motor. "actuator" can also be used as a stand-alone channel scanner (with no motor at all), I think that "rotorng" can do the same.
Bye
-
Dominic Evans -
Luca Olivetti -
YUP