On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:11:34PM +0000, peter_weber69 wrote: [html trash]
What you're saying?
Werner
"peter_weber69" peter_weber69@lycos.de writes:
xine-plugin on Server, only xine-player on client (thank’s to Patrick Boettcher for patch) http://mitglied.lycos.de/peterweber69/
Oh have i missed a new version of the xine-over-network patch from Patrick ? (or is it still the first version ?)
I should admit, i'm using it all the time ! it's far more stable than having 2 vdr processes + the old streamdev ( yep 2 vdr = 2 times more crashed ;-) )
It seems streamdev developpment has been resumed, YOUPI ! :) but last time i tried it was crashing vdr-server when the http/vtp stream was terminated.
I'm still dreaming of a mix of streamdev & xine plugins (+ multicast) :)
hmm is it possible to write plugins for vdr in python ? ;-)
Anyway, many thanks to the developpers !
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 syrius.ml@no-log.org wrote:
Oh have i missed a new version of the xine-over-network patch from Patrick ? (or is it still the first version ?)
It's still the first version or an adaption of the first (proof-of-concept) version for recent vdr-xine.
I should admit, i'm using it all the time ! it's far more stable than having 2 vdr processes + the old streamdev ( yep 2 vdr = 2 times more crashed ;-) )
So all of you say, that the networked-vdr-xine is running stable, with no (new) issues? Can't believe it :).
The idea of course is to integrate it into vdr-xine. Therefore the fifos would be removed (even for local use) and substituted by sockets. But neither me nor anyone else has had the time to do a clean integration into vdr-xine and xinelib. Reinhard says, that this part needs a cleanup anyway... So combining both steps is just logical.
regards, Patrick.
-- Mail: patrick.boettcher@desy.de WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/
On Mittwoch 09 März 2005 15:24, syrius.ml@no-log.org wrote:
hmm is it possible to write plugins for vdr in python ? ;-)
I think in theory it should be possible to write a layer in form of a special plugin which can then load and execute python code.
http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/
Patrick Boettcher patrick.boettcher@desy.de writes:
I should admit, i'm using it all the time ! it's far more stable than having 2 vdr processes + the old streamdev ( yep 2 vdr = 2 times more crashed ;-) )
So all of you say, that the networked-vdr-xine is running stable, with no (new) issues? Can't believe it :).
we've already noticed an issue with live-pausing :) and it seems vdr+networked-xine doesn't like when the xine ui is not correctly closed. (it freezes vdr, kill -9 is the only solution)
I'll do more tests this WE (with less plugins)
The idea of course is to integrate it into vdr-xine. Therefore the fifos would be removed (even for local use) and substituted by sockets. But neither me nor anyone else has had the time to do a clean integration into vdr-xine and xinelib. Reinhard says, that this part needs a cleanup anyway... So combining both steps is just logical.
ok
It is posible to run xine-player in two diferent machines simultaneously? Thanks. Jose Alberto
El Miércoles, 9 de Marzo de 2005 13:11, peter_weber69 escribió:
xine-plugin on Server, only xine-player on client
(thank’s to Patrick Boettcher for patch)
Files on my Homepage: [URL]http://mitglied.lycos.de/peterweber69/%5B/URL] direct: [URL]http://mitglied.lycos.de/peterweber69/xine/xine.htm%5B/URL]
see also: http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=31171&sid=
[IMG]http://mitglied.lycos.de/peterweber69/index-Dateien/image003.jpg%5B/IMG]
best regards, peter Leben Sie gesund? Gesundheit bei Lycos! Neu!
-
Dr. Werner Fink -
Jose Alberto Reguero -
Patrick Boettcher -
peter_weber69 -
syrius.ml＠no-log.org -
Wolfgang Rohdewald